Pigsaw Blog
All the pig that’s fit to saw

Surprising leftist tendencies

I’m in the strange position of feeling insulted, but slowly realising that I’m utterly wrong about this.

The first time I came across the term leftist it was in right wing blogs during the November 2004 US election. For instance, the Captain’s Quarters says:

The problem for Kedwards is they have no original proposals and can only offer a leftist spin on what the president has already accomplished.

There was much, much else around at the time. I felt the term mildly offensive then, and haven’t changed my mind since.

But recently it cropped up in a headline in — of all places — the Guardian: “Leftists plan ID card assault”. This was from no pyjamahadin, but from the venerable Michael White, their political editor. Though he won’t have written the headline himself, it was a significant moment. Standards are slipping down t’Guardian way, I thought.

Now following the term’s appearance again, today, I’m perturbed to find that it’s used widely and not at all pejoratively. The earliest I can trace it on Guardian Unlimited (outside a comment piece) is to 21 January 2001:

On Tuesday, he gave evidence at the trial of Hans-Joachim Klein, one of the leftist gunmen who attacked the Opec meeting in Vienna in 1975.

Wikipedia, rigorous in it neutral point of view, uses it casually in its discussion of left wing politics.

I don’t know when this term first appeared. For how long before January 2001 was it in use? And how did it bypass me for 30+ years?

Now, despite feeling aggrieved for so long, I find I’m completely out of kilter with the rest of the world. Adjustment is going to be difficult.

Tags: , , ,

4 Responses to Surprising leftist tendencies »»


Comments

  1. Comment by Captain Ed | 2005/07/29 at 11:40:25

    Imagine my surprise to get a trackback to such an old post!

    I’ll tel you why I use the term ‘leftist’ (or refer to ‘the Left’) — I think that the term ‘liberal’ in American politics is misapplied to the current ‘Left’ and has been for decades. ‘Liberal’ in classic terms derived from ‘liberty’ and indicated a form of political thought that emphasized personal freedom and reduced government control. ‘Liberals’ then were somewhat akin to libertarians today, without the anarchic insanity that the latter often espouses. Neither American party really reflects classic ‘liberal’ thinking. ‘Liberals’ also rejected isolationism and wanted to spread freedom like a gospel across the world. Wilson was a liberal. Teddy Roosevelt wasn’t.

    What passes for ‘liberal’ in American politics is really a statist, New Deal brand of politics that eclipsed liberalism but took its name. ‘Left’ is a more accurate term, IMHO.

  2. Comment by Captain Ed | 2005/07/29 at 11:41:12

    I should clarify one more thing: it’s not meant as an insult, merely as a more accurate term.

  3. Nik
    Comment by Nik | 2005/07/29 at 12:43:24

    One thing I didn’t make clear, Captain Ed, is that I’ve never considered the term “the left” or “left wing” to be at all pejorative, but (wrongly, it seems) did consider “leftist” to be so. In retrospect, that seems somewhat inconsistent.

    When I hear the term “liberal” used in the States I think of the Democrats, who are more to the left than the Republicans, but more to the right than the UK’s two left-of-centre parties: the Liberal Democrats and the (traditional) Labour party. So US-liberal is more to the right than UK-left ideology.

    “Liberal” in the UK implies centre-left (and more to the left than the US Democrats), mostly because it’s been adopted by the Liberal Democratic party who adopted that particular place on the political spectrum. Recently, though, it’s become even more confused, since the Labour party and LibDems have effectively swapped places on our political spectrum. (That’s why I referred to “traditional Labour” above, which is far more of a socialist tendency than what is today called New Labour.)

    So I think in the UK “liberal” is of less value than in the US, unless its use is very clear in context.

  4. Comment by Captain Ed | 2005/07/29 at 15:39:22

    Nik,

    Interesting! I actually think that the last liberal party died with the collapse of David Lloyd-George’s government after World War I. I think that the British had by far the clearest ‘liberal’ philosophy in the Anglosphere, and that neither major American party (or any of the minor ones, either) come close. Both Republicans and Democrats have borrowed small pieces of it at different times, but neither has embraced it as a philosophy, which is really too bad. Americans have corrupted the entire meaning of the word in horseshoeing it into our political structure.


Leave a Reply »»