Pigsaw Blog
All the pig that’s fit to saw

Form over function at Fopp

Pashmina’s been to Fopp, which I know is one of Jamie’s favourite places to buy DVDs, too. I clicked on the link to find out where they’re located.

Unfortunately the people at Fopp have placed form over function. Their website is entirely Flash-based, which means it’s pretty but user-hostile to anyone but the most naive of web users. Here are some of the things you can’t do with a Flash-based website:

  • Use your browser’s Back button. This is because the “website” is actually one page with a single Flash application on it. You may click around inside the Flash app, but as far as your browser is concerned you haven’t moved from the page you landed on. So after you’ve clicked through from, say, the home page to the Music page you’ve got to use their own navigation to return to the home page — your browser won’t help you. Similarly after leaving the site you can’t return to it and expect to land on any page except the home page.
  • Bookmark any page except the home page. Again, your browser sees it as just one page with a fancy gizmo on it. If you go to the Music page and bookmark it, then when you use your bookmark you’ll just get back to the home page.
  • Use Google or any other search engine over it. Google doesn’t read Flash applications, so is blind to the site’s content. I wanted to find the location of Fopp in London. A Google search for “london” across the Fopp site produces something peculiar and different. A Google search generally across Fopp produces an obscene-looking photograph, among other things. Probably not what their brand managers wanted.
  • Have a disability. (The words of Neil Kinnock come back to me here). If you have a motion disability you can find it hard to use a mouse or otherwise navigate a website. If you have a vision disability you can find difficult or impossible to read the words. Such people often have tools to help them, such as a screenreader, or exploit their web browser’s features by enlarging the text or using the keyboard. A lot of work has gone into these applications and into the browsers to enable all this. Unfortunately each Flash application has to redo all this work to make them accessible, and their creators rarely have the time.

I’m sure Fopp is terrific in its bricks-and-mortar form. But they’ve not yet engaged with the online world.

Tags: , , ,

7 Responses to Form over function at Fopp »»


Comments

  1. MC
    Comment by MC | 2006/04/19 at 12:44:28

    Yes, Flash is not the way to implement the whole site. And it is generally used too much for adverts, which is where flashblock comes in. But sometimes the power of Flash can be used for good.

  2. Nik
    Comment by Nik | 2006/04/19 at 13:43:09

    That’s nice. Though it’s made me realise another thing you can’t do with Flash (which you’d want to do with maps in particular): Print the page.

  3. Comment by Simon Wakeman | 2006/05/01 at 20:52:12

    Thanks for the great article. I think you’ve captured some key reasons to avoid Flash, or at least use very carefully as a secondary element on a site.

    One more I’d add would be that often when Flash is used, the designers tend to create a new user interface (UI) that’s different to the one they are used to. Sometimes it’s ok, but often the new UI is only really intuitive to the person who designed it!

  4. Nik
    Comment by Nik | 2006/05/02 at 10:36:47

    Another good point. Thanks. Designing a usable user interface is very difficult, and an interface designer is not the same thing as a graphic designer.

  5. Comment by Matt | 2006/07/27 at 10:34:47

    Flash is not great if you want to do a usable retail website. Screws with the speed as well.
    Hence why we went for an Open Source, simple e-commerce engine when redesigning the Fopp website internally. This enabled us to avoid the path many design agencies take you down with over-engineered snazzy websites that are not functional or customer friendly.

    Incidently we launched 2 weeks ago with a better site.

  6. Nik
    Comment by Nik | 2006/07/27 at 15:29:23

    Thanks, Matt. I’ve just added another article with this news.


Trackbacks & Pingbacks »»

  1. Pingback by Simon Wakeman » Why is Flash so bad? | 2006/07/23 at 21:08:28

    [...] Found a good summary of why building your site mostly or all in Flash is a bad idea: courtesy of Pigsaw. [...]

Leave a Reply »»