<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Of the BBC, snails and polar ice caps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pigsaw.org/permalink/2006/04/28/336/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pigsaw.org/permalink/2006/04/28/336</link>
	<description>All the pig that&#039;s fit to saw</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:48:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://blog.pigsaw.org/permalink/2006/04/28/336/comment-page-1#comment-2309</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 22:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pigsaw.org/permalink/2006/04/28/336#comment-2309</guid>
		<description>I must defend myself from any accusation that I am not a fully paid-up member of the Tom Is God group. I didn&#039;t say the BBC made it look easy by having a pot of money, I said the BBC had been successful because they worked bloody hard at it and chucked a lot of money at it. Unlike some other media organisations I could mention.

Go Tom!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must defend myself from any accusation that I am not a fully paid-up member of the Tom Is God group. I didn&#8217;t say the BBC made it look easy by having a pot of money, I said the BBC had been successful because they worked bloody hard at it and chucked a lot of money at it. Unlike some other media organisations I could mention.</p>
<p>Go Tom!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Coates</title>
		<link>http://blog.pigsaw.org/permalink/2006/04/28/336/comment-page-1#comment-2192</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Coates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 22:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pigsaw.org/permalink/2006/04/28/336#comment-2192</guid>
		<description>It seems pretty churlish to defend myself against a piece that&#039;s incredibly positive, but I&#039;d just like to add that there&#039;s a difference between having missed something and that being forgiveable, and claiming that everything&#039;s moving so fast that there&#039;s no way you could have foreseen it! My issue with this rhetoric (and it is the rhetoric I object to, not the organisations) is that it&#039;s really weasel-words to avoid saying that they weren&#039;t paying attention. My message would be, that&#039;s okay! It&#039;s okay that you weren&#039;t paying attention! As long as you learn from it and move on, that&#039;s a good thing. No one&#039;s perfect! But take some bloody responsibility, already, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems pretty churlish to defend myself against a piece that&#8217;s incredibly positive, but I&#8217;d just like to add that there&#8217;s a difference between having missed something and that being forgiveable, and claiming that everything&#8217;s moving so fast that there&#8217;s no way you could have foreseen it! My issue with this rhetoric (and it is the rhetoric I object to, not the organisations) is that it&#8217;s really weasel-words to avoid saying that they weren&#8217;t paying attention. My message would be, that&#8217;s okay! It&#8217;s okay that you weren&#8217;t paying attention! As long as you learn from it and move on, that&#8217;s a good thing. No one&#8217;s perfect! But take some bloody responsibility, already, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

