Pigsaw Blog
All the pig that’s fit to saw

Go Richmond! Scourge of the 4×4 owners

Good on Richmond council:

Motorists who drive gas-guzzling cars are to face significant rises in parking fees under a pioneering scheme to tackle climate change. Drivers of the most polluting vehicles will be charged up to £450 a year to park outside their homes under the plan, which marks one of the first serious attempts to penalise people for behaviour that damages the environment. [...] Households with more than one car will be forced to pay 50% more for extra permits, so a family with two vehicles in the highest polluting band will face parking fees of £750 each year.

By an amazing coincidence Streetcar today mailed me details of their latest car locations. And there’s one in Richmond. Ordinarily I’d say “they won’t get the proposal passed”. But it seems to be done deal. If things carry on like this, in ten years or so we might get away with only having to apply factor 25 sunblock each morning before we get into our boats to go to work.

Tags: , ,

2 Responses to Go Richmond! Scourge of the 4×4 owners »»


Comments

  1. Comment by Lloyd | 2006/10/25 at 17:59:21

    As an owner of a carefully-researched 4×4, I’m beginning to get narked by the continual direct association between “4×4″ and “gas-guzzler.” FYI, my Nissan X-Trail does less than 200g of CO2 emissions per kilometre, and is cleaner than all but one Volvo S60 and pretty much any engine-powered BMW. We wanted a big car. We didn’t want to damage the environment too much. It is actually possible, you know.

  2. Nik
    Comment by Nik | 2006/10/26 at 09:14:04

    Such an easy association to make, particularly by us time-pressed headline writers. You know what it’s like: editor’s on the warpath, your Croydon embed is on the phone demanding to know why you cut half his article yesterday, and you’ve still got two more blog entries to sub before the clock strikes five thirty and you can start flicking elastic bands across the room with impunity…

    At least Richmond don’t seem to be making the comparison, and are instead penalising “the most polluting vehicles” rather than those vehicles which have an excessive volume-to-children ratio (or even an excessive volume-to-distance-down-to-the-cornershop-to-pick-up-one-bottle-of-milk ratio).

    If the comparison chart on the wonderfully-named 4×4prejudice.org is anything to go by, then owners of Nissan X-Trails won’t be receiving nearly the same kind of penalty as owners of Jaguar XJ8s.

    By the way, did you want me to apologise?


Leave a Reply »»